Research Full Article

UDC  327

Annotation. The purpose of the study. The importance of the proposed work lies in the fact that competition is always about overcoming resistance to change and, first of all, ideological resistance, therefore, understanding the phenomena, processes and categories that influence the formation of analytical thinking and a systemic worldview in the mental space of both Russian students and their potential competitors is currently important. one of the most important and priority tasks. The mental space is the space where hybrid warfare strategies are intensively implemented in the context of the latest paradigms of geophilosophy, the purpose of which is to create and use appropriate mechanisms for correcting social, national and state worldviews/mentalities at the stages of its formation and self–realization both in the structure of their own states and in the structure of states. competitors. Results. Based on the understanding of the importance of forming competitive analytical thinking of students in the mental space of national interests, especially among those students who study foreign subjects, 30 postulates are proposed, which are subject-logical tools for forming a sound competitive systemic expert opinion. Conclusions. Any taught humanitarian discipline should be considered in the paradigm of competitive confrontation, it should highlight positions of vulnerability, show how it can be used to reduce or increase the resistance of consciousness to proposed changes, demonstrate how its postulates strengthen or weaken the characteristics of the national mentality due to the lack of appropriate components of analytical thinking

Keywords: Keywords: geophilosophy, national mentality, student youth, knowledge system, competitiveness, problems, laws of development, analytical thinking, postulates

References:

1. Atoyan K.L., Higher education in the EAEU Member States: integration issues. Dialogue: politics, law, economics, 2018, no. 2 (9), pp. 66-72. (In Russian).

2. Agamirov K.V. Forecasting the legal regulation of the economic sphere of the “zone of knowledge” of the Eurasian Economic Union. Legal science, 2020, no. 7, pp. 62-65. (In Russian).

3. Denisenko V.V. Competitiveness of the Russian educational system within the EAEU. Polylogue, 2020, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 7. (In Russian).

4. Devdariani N.V. Rubtsova E.V. The main functions of vocational education in the development of interstate cooperation: integration processes. Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology, 2021, vol. 10, no. 2 (35), pp. 90-93. (In Russian).

5. Evseev V.O. Human resources in the system of socio-economic equations: a textbook/V.O. Evseev- 2nd ed., revised and add. – M.: University textbook:INFRA-M, 2021, 379 p. (In Russian).

6. Evseev V.O. Computer modeling of socio-political processes: A monograph. – M.: Tsentrkatalog, 2020.-256 p. – (Scientific Foundation) (In Russian).

7. Krasnova N.V. Knowledge management system. Management today, 2021, no. 3. pp. 242-256. (In Russian).

8. Mau V. A. Knowledge management: content, functions, principles. Economics and Society, 2021, no. 5-1 (84), pp. 751-759. (In Russian).

9. Panova T.V. Ensuring national security: general approaches and industry specifics. Issues of economics and law, 2016, no. 99, pp. 45-48. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28897473

10. Panova T.V. Ensuring national security: general approaches and industry specifics. Issues of economics and law, 2016, no. 99, pp. 45-48. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28897473_15348641.pdf